0 Comments
You hereby grant to Prime Publishing, its Affiliates and sublicensees a nonexclusive, worldwide, royalty-free license to use all trademarks, trade names, and the names and likenesses of any individuals that appear in the Materials. If you decide you would like to remove your Materials from the Service, you may provide written notice to Prime Publishing by either deleting the image through the Prime Publishing interface or by contacting Prime Publishing customer service, and Prime Publishing will remove such Materials from the Service within a reasonable period of time.ĥ) License for Name, Trademarks and Likenesses. You hereby grant to Prime Publishing and its Affiliates a worldwide, nonexclusive, royalty-free, perpetual right and license to (a) reproduce, distribute, transmit, publicly perform and publicly display the Materials, in whole or in part, in any manner and Media, (b) modify, adapt, translate and create derivative works from the Materials, in whole or in part, in any manner and Media, and (c) sublicense the foregoing rights, in whole or in part, to any third party, with or without a fee.Ĥ) Removal of Materials. As used in this Agreement, (a) "Affiliates" means any entity controlled by, in control of, or under common control with Prime Publishing, (b) "Materials" means all content that you submit to Prime Publishing, including all photographs, illustrations, graphics and text, and (c) "Media" means any means of conveying information, whether now known or hereafter devised.ģ) License Grant for Materials. Further, you may not submit any personally identifiable information about any child under the age of 13.Ģ) Definitions. Minors may not submit Materials to the Service. The Service is limited to parties that lawfully can enter into and form contracts under applicable law. In other words, if you submit a digital image to us, you must own all rights to such image or you must have the authorization of the person who does own those rights. You may only submit Materials to the Service for which you hold all intellectual property rights. BY CLICKING THE ACCEPT TERMS AND CONDITIONS BUTTON, YOU AGREE TO BE BOUND BY ALL TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT AND ALL SPECIFICATIONS AND GUIDELINES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.ġ) Eligibility. Any individual or entity that wants to use the Service must accept the terms of this Agreement without change. and "you" means the individual or entity submitting materials to Prime Publishing. As used in this Agreement, "we" or "Prime Publishing" means Prime Publishing, LLC. All you need to do is a reverse fold using the existing creases, but there are so many folds at the same time that it can be confusing for beginners.You must enter into this Agreement if you want to submit digital images or other content to Prime Publishing through Sharing Customer Images (the "Service"). There is one step to make the head (9:14) where people sometimes find difficult to make. If you have any trouble, watch the video tutorial! Help video Origami Velociraptor diagrams available to download. However, special paper isn’t required and you can use even smaller sheets like 10cm x 10cm origami paper to fold this dinosaur. This paper has a beautiful texture and holds the creases very well. In the video tutorial I’m using 20cm x 20cm Green Tissue-foil. If you like dinosaurs, check out my playlist on YouTube and try also the T-Rex and the Brachiosaurus. Another great feature is the head: you can make it flat or with a nice 3D shape! I’m very satisfied with this model and I think it’s much better than the T-Rex: it holds the shape well and it can even stand on his feet without tail support, if you use a good paper. The velociraptor has longer tail/arms and smaller head. This model and my origami T-Rex are very similar because I’ve created both dinosaurs from the same base. Learn how to make an origami Velociraptor The importance of integrating biomarkers into the TNM staging has been emphasized in the 8 th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging System ( Prognostic biomarkers are becoming increasingly important given that many low early-stage breast cancer patients have excellent outcomes with standard of care treatments. Npj Breast Cancer volume 8, Article number: 3 ( 2022) Abstract 503.Tumor infiltrating lymphocyte stratification of prognostic staging of early-stage triple negative breast cancer Event-free survival by residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + chemotherapy versus placebo + chemotherapy for early TNBC: exploratory analysis from KEYNOTE-522. Pusztai L, Denkert C, O’Shaughnessy J, et al. These findings underline the relevance of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab therapy for improving survival in patients with early-stage TNBC, representing a subset of patients who may require further therapies. A small subset of patients with severe RCB, RCB-3, had a poor prognosis in both arms: 5.1% in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group and 6.7% in the chemotherapy-alone group. In the RCB-0, -1, and -2 categories, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy increased EFS compared with chemotherapy alone however, the small sample size restricts interpretation in the RCB-3 category. In the pembrolizumab arm, patients with remaining disease had lower RCB levels, including fewer patients with RCB-3. Of note, a higher RCB score was linked to a lower EFS. Distant recurrence was the most prevalent EFS event in both arms however, it occurred in fewer patients in the pembrolizumab arm in all RCB categories. RCB was relegated to lower categories across the board by pembrolizumab. A Cox regression model with therapy as a covariate was used to investigate the relationship between RCB categories (RCB-0, -1, -2, -3, corresponding to gradually increasing RCB) and EFS.Īt the time of data cutoff, the median follow-up was 39.1 months. RCB was evaluated by a local pathologist at the time of the operation. Patients were given pembrolizumab or placebo for 9 cycles after definitive surgery or until recurrence or intolerable toxicity. The study enrolled 1174 patients with previously untreated, nonmetastatic, stage T1c/N1-2 or T2-4/N0-2 TNBC. Treatment regimens included pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks or placebo given with 4 cycles of paclitaxel plus carboplatin, then 4 cycles of doxorubicin or epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide. In this exploratory investigation, EFS using RCB was evaluated. The residual cancer burden (RCB) approach for quantifying the degree of remaining disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been demonstrated to have prognostic significance in previous research. The primary end points were pathologic complete response (pCR) and event-free survival (EFS), and the investigators found that pembrolizumab improved pCR and EFS in statistically significant and clinically important ways. In the KEYNOTE-522 (NCT03036488) study, patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) were given pembrolizumab in addition to chemotherapy. STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Old Republic Surety Company answer now due, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Old Republic Surety Company.(Attorney John Michael McGowan added to party Old Republic Surety Company(pty:dft))(McGowan, John) (McGowan, John)Ĭertificate of Service filed by Defendants JK Technical Services, Inc., Old Republic Surety Company re: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #12 (McGowan, John)ĪNSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants JK Technical Services, Inc., Old Republic Surety Company.(McGowan, John) NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants JK Technical Services, Inc., Old Republic Surety Company, identifying Old Republic General Insurance Group, Inc., Old Republic International Corporation. ORDER SETTING INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE for at 3:00 PM before Judge Stephen V. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff United States of America, upon Defendant JK Technical Services, Inc. SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff United States of America, upon Defendant Old Republic Surety Company served on, answer due. This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2019. We will replace any of our products found to be defective based on normal wear and use!
Starbucks® Espresso Capsules Compatibility Starbucks® espresso capsules work with all normal Nespresso machines that you would buy for home use. Over time and with regular use your Nespresso® machine will experience a build-up of old coffee oils and residue in its brewing chamber This is where old coffee residue sits, blocking the nozzle and making your coffee taste bitter and your coffee flow poor. Ristretto is made with half the water content you would use for espresso, while lungo is made with double the water content Therefore, ristretto and lungo are opposite of each other. In brief, the main difference between ristretto espresso and lungo is the amount of water in them. What is the difference between lungo and ristretto? Normally, we grind at 9 or so on the Breville Barista Pro for a normal espresso, using 18g of coffee in to pull our shot If you enjoy a range of extraction sizes and coffee styles, the Vertuo system could be your ideal solution. The Lungo capsules contain coffee of a coarser grind. What size is a Nespresso lungo?Ī Lungo is a 110 mL shot of coffee (the large cup button). While espressos are extracted for 25 to 35 seconds, Lungos keep going.and going.and going they stop anywhere from 45 seconds to a minute. It’s called an “Americano” when the water comes after the espresso Lungo stands for “Long” in Italian – it’s a long espresso. Meanwhile, a lungo is an espresso variant. What is the least bitter Nespresso?Įthiopia Master Origin : Best light roast Nespresso Capsule There is little to no bitterness either, making it the perfect ‘light coffee’.Ī latte is an espresso and milk based drink that involves pouring steamed milk and milk foam over a shot or two of espresso. Lungo (Italian for “long”) is a coffee beverage made by using an espresso machine to make an Italian-style coffee – short black (a single espresso shot) with more water (generally twice as much), resulting in a larger coffee, a lungo. The second cup tasted fine the only difference is it was a bit weaker than the first cup, but it still tasted great. Can you use a Nespresso pod twice?Īll you do is use each pod twice ! After using the Nespresso pod to make your cappuccino or espresso, simply put the pod back into the machine and have it make you another cup. For ristretto and lungo, add 10 and 20 ml of milk accordingly. How to make ! First, brew the espresso coffee (40ml or 1.35 fl oz) with your coffee machine and pour it into the cup. A lungo will have more caffeine than regular espresso, but only by a little bit. This is because you’re more fully extracting the coffee grounds. The longer an espresso shot is pulled, the more caffeine it has. This dark roasted coffee is a blend of a distinctive Arabica from India with a Robusta from Mexico. It is a long-cup that stimulates the senses through its high intensity and generous character. Envivo Lungo was specially designed for the morning by nespresso coffee experts. Ristretto capsules are made from a blend of East African and South American Arabica coffee. Statistically, the most popular Nespresso capsule is Ristretto This ultra-bold flavor is perfect for dark brews and drinks such as lattes and Americanos. Can I Make a Lungo Using a Nespresso Espresso Capsule? This is actually quite important – you should not make an espresso using a lungo capsule or vice versa! The coffee blends and their respective flavours are put together specifically with the extraction time in mind. It achieves this by inserting extra frames into the source content, creating a more fluid effect. Motion smoothing, also known as Motion Interpolation, Film Mode, or TruMotion, is a feature found on some modern TVs that is designed to reduce motion blur, exhibit smoother motion, and reduce judder. Yes, it is usually recommended to disable motion smoothing.
Fake vs Real Travis Scott Fragment Jordan 1: The Inner Side Ensure that the fonts and the spacing correspond to the authentic example below, yet take into account the fact that there may be some quality control inconsistencies in such a detail. Even an authentic logo might throw you off if you don’t know what to look for. This model does not have an Air Jordan wings logo we are all used to (the one with the thin fonts and the connecting R and D). An authentic Jordan 1 Fragment x Travis Scott would use a thick, high-quality thread, while a counterfeit would use much lower quality materials. However, what actually differentiates a fake from a real Jordan 1 is the thickness of the thread. It is typical for a real pair to have a bit of a sloppy stitching. Moving to the third step of the authentication process, start by examining the stitching around the well-known wings logo. How to Spot Fake Fragment x Travis Scott Air Jordan 1 High: The Wings Logo Trusted by reselling stores & 80.000+ clients worldwide An authentic toe box would have a rather boxy toe box (excuse the repetition).Įxpert team authentication in less than 30 minutes The majority of the fake pairs the LegitGrails team has spotted had a rather curved toe box please refer to the Jordan 1 TS Fragment real vs fake comparison below. The toe box is another great detail to be verified. Our legit check team has noticed a great tendency in the replica Fragment x Travis Scott Jordan 1: the fakes tend to have a yellow-ish midsole, while the authentic pairs have a much purer shade of white. There must be three levels of the grains on the midsole that are visibly separated. The counterfeits tend to miss out on the correct grain pattern. The rubber midsole is often a great reference point for a Jordan 1 Fragment legit check. Moving along the outer side of the shoe, pay attention to the toe box of your pair. How to Authenticate Jordan 1 High Fragment TS: The Toe Box In the lower grade replicas, the gap between the Swoosh and the stitching is often very big. In the real vs fake Travis Scott Fragment Jordan 1 comparison, notice the placement of the Swoosh’s tip relative to the corner stitching. Remember to also check the position of the reverse Swoosh - the signature Jordan 1 Cactus Jack feature. The fake Fragment x Travis Scott Air Jordan 1 High would often have sloppy cuts, making the strips appear messy. Talking about the leather details, make sure you examine the leather strips around the eyelets. The heel of an authentic Jordan pair should be rather straight, while still having some difference between the levels of leather. Look at the heel area from the side: the replica Jordan 1 TS Fragments often appear more bent, compared to a real pair. The AJ 1 High Travis Scott X Fragment is available now for above retail at eBay.ĭid you know we have a great community where we discuss reviews and various other nerdy topics? You can join WearTesters here.Jordan 1 Fragment x Travis Scott Legit Check: The Overall ShapeĪt the very beginning, you should inspect the overall look of your pair. Colorway: SAIL/BLACK-MILITARY BLUE-SHY PINK.How to Buy the Air Jordan 1 High Travis Scott X Fragment Watch the full video by pressing play above or by clicking here to watch on YouTube. Let us know your opinion on the AJ 1 High Travis Scott X Fragment on YouTube or Twitter. He supplies expert level opinions on the materials, cushioning, traction, support, and fit. In the video, Chris provides detailed information from all the usual categories, providing the in depth information you need. We hope this video makes you think twice about paying resell prices for stuff like this.Ĭheck out Chris’s thoughts on the AJ 1 High Travis Scott X Fragment in the video and article. And, of course, scarcity jacks prices up. It is just absolutely sad and disheartening when we see resellers having an inordinate amount of a highly coveted sneakers and then us, regular folks, can’t even get a pair for retail. The Air Jordan 1 High Travis Scott X Fragment is one of the most beautiful shoes out there, for hypebeasts and even the OG sneakerheads who’ve been around long enough to know the colorway’s history. In commercial buildings, they were often used for stairwells, balcony screening, and curtain wall sun-shading to large windows. Breeze blocks are not (usually) structural, hence they were often used where a garden meets a house – patio screens or carports or garden walls. The breeze block can also be linked more broadly to the tradition of the brise soleil, which refers to any kind of sun baffle installed outside the skin of a building (which is where the sun screens should be! Stop the heat before it enters your building envelope!). Inspired by the ornamentation on Mayan temples, the relief patterns on Lloyd Wright’s blocks are only slightly reminiscent of what we in Australia would call a breeze block (or screen block, or pattern block, or cinder block) because they are much less permeable – really his is a wall system, rather than a screen one. Millard House, also known as La Miniatura, is a textile block house designed by Frank Lloyd Wright and built in 1923 in Pasadena, California. Some people credit Frank Lloyd Wright with inventing them, and indeed he did invent a precast concrete “textile block” system, which he used on several houses in Los Angeles including the Millard and Ennis Houses. Patterned concrete blocks have a long (and sometimes celebrated) lineage. Meanwhile on Pinterest it’s fascinating to see patterns and shapes from other countries – some highly inventive and very beautiful, a long way from the one or two rather stolid designs that were standard in the Adelaide suburbs of my childhood. Marshall has been collecting images of breezeblocks for sixteen years, and has more than nine thousand followers. You only need to dip into the Instagram feed of Sydney architect Sam Marshall, aka to see the architectural community (including me, I’ll admit) collectively drooling over the multifarious screens, walls, fences, stairwells, undercrofts, carports, and garden rooms that this versatile material lends itself to. James Russell Architect, Naranga Avenue House. It takes the performance advantage of isset() while maintaining the correct checking result (i.e. A combination of these two (see below code) would help. If using method 2, it’s a good idea to validate the selected country first, to make sure it won’t result in a redirect to a malicious page. arraykeyexists() is SLOW compared to isset(). The second method is much more concise, but less secure because a malicious user could monkey around with the form and submit whatever value he wants. The first method requires writing more code, but is more secure because it ensures the form only redirects to 6 pre-programmed cases, or else displays an error message and ends execution. The second method is just passing the selected value to the header function to redirect to the correct page. If the selected country is not found in one of the cases, the “default” case is assumed, and “Error!” is displayed. In this case, each case is redirecting to the corresponding page to the selected country. Each case matches the variable passed the switch and performs all actions after that case up until a break statement. If a list of values separated by a comma is contained on a single line. The switch method is basically a concise method of writing a bunch of “if” statements. There must not be more than one statement per line. These two approaches have their pro’s and con’s. comment out the method you don't want to demonstrateĬase "France" : $redir = "France.html" break Ĭase "Mexico" : $redir = "Mexico.html" break Ĭase "Russia" : $redir = "Russia.html" break Ĭase "Japan" : $redir = "Japan.html" break ĭefault : echo( "Error!") exit() break note that both methods can't be demonstrated at the same time Echo( "There was an error with your form: \n ") |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |